Loblaw and George Weston 500M Settlement Over Alleged Packaged Bread Price Fixing

The Loblaw and George Weston 500M Settlement Over Alleged Packaged Bread Price Fixing settlement offers $500M in total to eligible claimants who resided in canada as of december 31, 2021. The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is not required.
Deadline: No deadline specified
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim
Proof is currently listed as not required (N/A). If a claims process is approved, the administrator may still request basic information such as contact details and an attestation of packaged bread purchases during Nov 2001–Dec 31, 2021; receipts may not be necessary, but final requirements will be set in the court-approved distribution plan.
Settlement Summary
A proposed $500 million Canadian class action targets an alleged, industry-wide scheme to fix the price of packaged bread—an everyday staple—over a long period (November 2001 to December 31, 2021). The case names major grocers and suppliers, including Loblaw and George Weston (and related baking businesses), along with Sobeys, Metro, Walmart Canada, Giant Tiger, and Canada Bread, and it grew out of a Competition Bureau investigation that included raids in October 2017. If approved, the settlement would include $404 million in cash from George Weston and Loblaw plus $96 million previously delivered through Loblaw’s earlier “Loblaw Card” program, making it the largest antitrust settlement in Canadian history. The lawsuit was filed because plaintiffs allege consumers paid artificially inflated prices due to coordinated conduct rather than normal competition, and class actions are often the main tool for returning money to large numbers of people who each suffered relatively small losses. The proposed class generally covers people living in Canada who bought packaged bread from the defendants during the class period, with a distribution plan and claim process to be set by the court (deadlines and individual payout amounts are still pending). Beyond compensation, the case is significant because it underscores how concentrated grocery and food-supply markets can magnify the impact of any collusion, and it highlights Canadian competition-law enforcement under the Competition Act, where price-fixing can trigger criminal investigation by the Competition Bureau and follow-on civil claims seeking damages for consumers who argue they were overcharged.
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Resided in Canada as of December 31, 2021
- Purchased packaged bread in Canada
- Purchase(s) occurred between November 2001 and December 31, 2021
- Packaged bread was purchased from one or more of the defendants (or their related brands/operations, as defined in the case)
- Not an excluded person (e.g., defendants and their related/affiliated parties as defined by the settlement/class definition)
- Submit a claim if/when a claims process opens (deadline and method pending court-approved distribution plan)
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico
Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.
