Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

The Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses settlement offers $3.30M in total, with individual payouts of $5K to $5K to eligible claimants who must be a living, natural person residing in the united states.. The deadline to file is June 18, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.
Deadline: June 18, 2026
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
All claimants must submit the unique ID from the postcard notice they received; online claimants must also provide the PIN from the same notice. Claimants who seek the documented loss payment must provide documentation showing the amount of unreimbursed losses and that the losses were likely caused by the incident; personal statements alone are not sufficient. Acceptable proof includes credit card/bank statements, emails, invoices/receipts, telephone records, or photographs of relevant documents. For the pro rata cash payment, documentation is generally not required beyond confirming eligibility (and California residency, if applicable).
Settlement Summary
Absolute Dental Group LLC faced a class action after a cybercriminal reportedly gained unauthorized access to its systems sometime between Feb. 19, 2025, and March 5, 2025, potentially exposing patients’ or consumers’ personal information. People who received notice of the incident may be able to file a claim for up to $5,000 in reimbursement for certain documented, unreimbursed losses, plus a separate “pro rata” cash payment that is shared among all approved claimants. The $3.3 million settlement—resolving allegations that the company failed to maintain adequate data security policies—became a way for affected individuals to recover some costs tied to the breach without having to prove each harm in court. The lawsuit was filed to hold the company accountable for allegedly inadequate safeguards and to create a streamlined process for compensation, which is especially significant in privacy and security cases where individual damages can be hard to quantify. Beyond the individual payout, settlements like this underscore a growing expectation in healthcare and consumer-data industries that companies adopt “reasonable” cybersecurity controls, respond properly to incidents, and comply with data-protection obligations and reporting duties; in the U.S., this often intersects with state privacy laws such as California’s Consumer Privacy Act/related breach notification frameworks and broader regulatory expectations from agencies including the Federal Trade Commission, as well as healthcare-specific rules where applicable. Similar cases have played out across many sectors as breaches trigger claims that safeguards were insufficient and as courts increasingly evaluate whether security programs matched evolving industry standards, including incident response, access controls, and monitoring.
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Must be a living, natural person residing in the United States.
- Must have had personal information potentially impacted by the Absolute Dental data incident dated Feb. 19, 2025 to March 5, 2025.
- Must have received notice from Absolute Dental Group LLC about the data incident.
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims
Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico
Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.
