FCA US (Fiat Chrysler Automobiles) agreed to a proposed $19.7 million class action settlement over allegations that certain 2017–2018 Dodge Grand Caravans—specifically those built in 2017—were fitted with rear power sliding door lock actuators and/or latches that can mechanically fail, leaving the doors unable to reliably lock or unlock. For owners of a family-focused minivan, that kind of malfunction isn’t just an annoyance: it can create safety and security concerns (for example, difficulty securing the vehicle or ensuring doors are properly latched), and it can lead to repeated repair visits and out-of-pocket costs. The lawsuit was filed because plaintiffs claimed FCA US knew or should have known about the defect and that consumers paid for a vehicle that didn’t perform as promised, while FCA US denies wrongdoing and the court has not determined liability. Even so, the settlement is significant because it offers concrete relief: reimbursement for qualifying repair expenses (with documentation) and an extended warranty covering future repairs for up to 10 years from the in-service date or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first—an approach commonly used in auto defect cases to address both past losses and ongoing risk for owners who haven’t yet experienced the failure. More broadly, this case fits a familiar pattern in the auto industry, where recurring component problems—especially those affecting doors, locks, and latching mechanisms—often surface through consumer complaints, dealership service records, and defect investigations, and then get resolved through class settlements that standardize compensation and repairs. While this settlement is not the same as a government-ordered safety recall, it operates alongside the wider regulatory backdrop in which manufacturers must comply with federal vehicle safety rules and, when a safety-related defect is identified, coordinate remedies and reporting through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), making extended-warranty-and-reimbursement deals an important tool when disputes arise over whether and how a widespread defect should be fixed for everyone impacted.