Skip to main content
Back
Mar 30, 2026

FCA US 19.7M Settlement Over Dodge Grand Caravan Sliding Door Latch Failures

Settlement Image

The FCA US 19.7M Settlement Over Dodge Grand Caravan Sliding Door Latch Failures settlement, with individual payouts of TBD to eligible claimants who purchased or leased a 2017–2018 dodge grand caravan in the united states. The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is required.

Deadline
Pending

Deadline: No deadline specified

Total Settlement Amount
TBD

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Required

Provide the affected vehicle’s 17-digit VIN. For reimbursement claims, include proof of purchase or lease and documentation showing out-of-pocket payment for qualifying repairs (e.g., invoices/receipts). If repairs were performed under warranty, provide the servicing dealership information and any available service records.

Settlement Summary

FCA US (Fiat Chrysler Automobiles) agreed to a proposed $19.7 million class action settlement over allegations that certain 2017–2018 Dodge Grand Caravans—specifically those built in 2017—were fitted with rear power sliding door lock actuators and/or latches that can mechanically fail, leaving the doors unable to reliably lock or unlock. For owners of a family-focused minivan, that kind of malfunction isn’t just an annoyance: it can create safety and security concerns (for example, difficulty securing the vehicle or ensuring doors are properly latched), and it can lead to repeated repair visits and out-of-pocket costs. The lawsuit was filed because plaintiffs claimed FCA US knew or should have known about the defect and that consumers paid for a vehicle that didn’t perform as promised, while FCA US denies wrongdoing and the court has not determined liability. Even so, the settlement is significant because it offers concrete relief: reimbursement for qualifying repair expenses (with documentation) and an extended warranty covering future repairs for up to 10 years from the in-service date or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first—an approach commonly used in auto defect cases to address both past losses and ongoing risk for owners who haven’t yet experienced the failure. More broadly, this case fits a familiar pattern in the auto industry, where recurring component problems—especially those affecting doors, locks, and latching mechanisms—often surface through consumer complaints, dealership service records, and defect investigations, and then get resolved through class settlements that standardize compensation and repairs. While this settlement is not the same as a government-ordered safety recall, it operates alongside the wider regulatory backdrop in which manufacturers must comply with federal vehicle safety rules and, when a safety-related defect is identified, coordinate remedies and reporting through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), making extended-warranty-and-reimbursement deals an important tool when disputes arise over whether and how a widespread defect should be fixed for everyone impacted.

Entities Involved

FCA US
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
Dodge
Dodge Grand Caravan
Authorized FCA US dealerships
fcarecallreimbursement.com (settlement website)
Court (final approval hearing authority)

Related Topics

Dodge Grand Caravan settlement
sliding door latch settlement
door lock actuator defect
FCA US class action
Fiat Chrysler settlement
Grand Caravan door lock reimbursement
minivan sliding door lock failure
extended warranty door latch
rear power sliding door actuator
2017 Dodge Grand Caravan recall reimbursement
2018 Dodge Grand Caravan door latch
FCA reimbursement claim
VIN required claim settlement
authorized FCA dealership repair
class action settlement claim

Eligibility Requirements

  • Purchased or leased a 2017–2018 Dodge Grand Caravan in the United States
  • Vehicle was built between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017
  • Class membership appears to include owners/lessees regardless of whether the defect occurred (benefits differ based on repairs)
  • To seek reimbursement, must have qualifying out-of-pocket repair costs related to rear power sliding door lock actuator/latch issues
  • For warranty-extension repairs, must present the vehicle for service at an authorized FCA US dealership within the coverage limits (up to 10 years from in-service date or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first)

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.