Amazon’s Prime program bundles fast shipping, streaming, and other perks into a paid subscription, and its massive scale means even small “friction” in sign-up or cancellation flows can affect millions of people. This class action settlement stems from allegations that some customers were unintentionally enrolled in Prime between June 23, 2019 and June 23, 2025—often described in consumer-protection disputes as “negative option” marketing, where a company treats silence or a confusing checkout path as consent to ongoing charges. Under the proposed settlement, eligible consumers may claim up to $51 without providing proof, reflecting the practical reality that many people don’t keep old receipts or screen captures even if they were charged. The lawsuit was filed to recover fees allegedly paid due to unclear enrollment mechanisms and to pressure changes in how subscription consent is obtained and how easy it is to cancel, issues that regulators have increasingly prioritized. Its significance is tied to a broader wave of cases and enforcement actions targeting subscription “dark patterns,” including high-profile scrutiny of large digital platforms’ sign-up and cancellation design. In the wider industry context, the Federal Trade Commission has long used rules like the Negative Option Rule and enforcement under Section 5 of the FTC Act (unfair or deceptive acts or practices) to police misleading subscription practices, and recent regulatory efforts have pushed companies toward clearer disclosures, express informed consent, and simpler cancellation—standards that similar subscription businesses across streaming, retail, and software are being compelled to meet as consumers become more alert to recurring-charge traps and regulators become less tolerant of them