Skip to main content
Back
Apr 1, 2026

AbleTo 23 Dollar Settlement for Unwanted Prerecorded Voicemail Calls to Aetna Members

Settlement Image

The AbleTo 23 Dollar Settlement for Unwanted Prerecorded Voicemail Calls to Aetna Members settlement, with individual payouts of $23 to eligible claimants who be a current or former aetna member.. The deadline to file is June 3, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
20 days remaining

Deadline: June 3, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
TBD

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
$23

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No documentary proof is required to file a claim per the settlement website. Claimants will typically provide basic contact information and attest (under penalty of perjury) that they received a prerecorded voicemail from AbleTo during the covered period.

Settlement Summary

A recent class action settlement resolves claims that AbleTo sent unwanted prerecorded voicemails to Aetna members, offering a $23 payout to people who received such messages between September 29, 2019 and February 2, 2026; claimants need not submit proof and the deadline to participate is June 3, 2026. The suit arises from laws that restrict autodialed and prerecorded calls without a recipient’s prior consent, and plaintiffs typically seek statutory damages and injunctive relief when those protections are alleged to have been breached. Even modest per-person awards can be significant because they underscore the legal and financial risks companies face when using automated outreach tools without clear consent. This settlement is part of a long line of TCPA-style class actions over robocalls and prerecorded messages, and it highlights broader industry pressures on health‑tech vendors, insurers, and care-management firms to document consent, provide opt-outs, and avoid transmitting sensitive health details without appropriate safeguards. Regulators such as the FCC, state attorneys general, and consumer advocates monitor these practices, and companies must navigate both TCPA requirements and health‑privacy considerations (like HIPAA and state privacy laws) when designing member outreach programs to reduce litigation and compliance risk.

Entities Involved

AbleTo
Aetna
AbleToTCPASettlement.com
TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act)

Related Topics

AbleTo class action
Aetna robocall settlement
unwanted voicemail settlement
TCPA settlement
prerecorded voicemail claim
robocall lawsuit payout
phone privacy settlement
Aetna members settlement
claim for robocalls
telemarketing voicemail lawsuit
class action $23 payout
AbleTo voicemail claim

Eligibility Requirements

  • Be a current or former Aetna member.
  • Have received a prerecorded voicemail from AbleTo between September 29, 2019 and February 2, 2026.
  • Not be excluded from the settlement class (e.g., you did not timely opt out).
  • Submit a valid claim by the June 3, 2026 deadline.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.