SunPower 11 Million Settlement for Alleged Misleading Statements by Former Officers
The SunPower 11 Million Settlement for Alleged Misleading Statements by Former Officers settlement offers $11M in total to eligible claimants who purchased or otherwise acquired sunpower corp. common stock or traded other sunpower securities between may 3, 2023 and july 19, 2024 (inclusive). The deadline to file is July 26, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.
Deadline: July 26, 2026
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
Claimants must provide the last four digits of their Social Security number or full taxpayer identification number and detailed transaction and holding records: number of SunPower securities held as of market close May 2, 2023; trade dates and quantities for purchases/acquisitions and sales from May 3, 2023 through Oct. 16, 2024; price per share or per contract and total amounts; number of securities held as of market close Oct. 16, 2024. Acceptable supporting documents include broker confirmation slips, monthly brokerage account statements, or an authorized broker statement showing transactional and holding information. Representatives (executors, trustees, guardians, etc.) must supply proof of authority and all joint owners must sign the claim form.
Settlement Summary
A securities class action claims that three former SunPower officers made materially false or misleading statements about the company’s financial health between May 3, 2023, and July 19, 2024, allegedly inflating the stock price until corrective disclosures caused investor losses. The officers agreed to an $11 million settlement while denying wrongdoing; SunPower was dismissed as a defendant after it filed for bankruptcy in August 2024. Investors who bought or traded SunPower securities during the class period may file claims under the court-approved allocation, with the administrator estimating an average net recovery of about $0.13 per eligible share after fees and expenses and setting rules for recognized losses, lookback periods, and documentation requirements. This case was filed under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the statute commonly used to allege misleading public statements and officer or control-person liability. Such lawsuits are a recurring mechanism for shareholder recovery and market discipline—seen across industries when companies issue corrective disclosures—and they operate alongside SEC oversight of disclosure practices. The SunPower settlement underscores two industry realities: settlements can provide partial relief but are often reduced by fees and bankruptcy complications, and the renewable-energy sector, like others, faces investor scrutiny that can prompt tighter internal controls and more cautious public disclosures going forward.
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Purchased or otherwise acquired SunPower Corp. common stock or traded other SunPower securities between May 3, 2023 and July 19, 2024 (inclusive)
- Allegedly suffered damages as a result of the alleged misstatements or omissions
- Individuals and legal entities (both natural persons and organizations) may be class members
- Claims must be submitted by the beneficial owner or by a legal representative with proof of authority
- All joint owners must sign the claim form; each separate legal entity or separately managed account must file a separate claim
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims
Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico
Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.