Skip to main content
Back
Feb 13, 2026

Ram Trucks ABS Class Action Settlement Up to 2500 for 2017 to 2018 models

Settlement Image

The Ram Trucks ABS Class Action Settlement Up to 2500 for 2017 to 2018 models settlement, with individual payouts of TBD to eligible claimants who be a current owner or current lessee of an eligible ram truck. The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is required.

Deadline
Pending

Deadline: No deadline specified

Total Settlement Amount
TBD

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Required

Claimants must provide documentation showing they are the current owner or lessee of a covered 2017–2018 Ram 2500/3500/4500/5500 built between April 1, 2017 and December 29, 2018 (for example, registration, title, lease agreement, or comparable vehicle/ownership records).

Settlement Summary

Owners and lessees of certain 2017–2018 Ram heavy-duty trucks (Ram 2500, 3500, 4500, and 5500) built between April 1, 2017 and December 29, 2018 may be covered by a class action settlement involving the vehicles’ anti-lock braking system (ABS). ABS is designed to help drivers maintain steering control during hard braking by preventing wheel lockup, and because braking performance is a core safety feature, alleged defects can quickly become costly for drivers and high-stakes for manufacturers. The settlement website indicates payouts vary, deadlines vary, and proof is required, reflecting that claims may depend on ownership/lease status, documented repairs, or other eligibility factors. The lawsuit was filed because plaintiffs alleged an issue with the ABS system in the covered trucks and sought compensation for affected consumers, along with remedies that can include reimbursement for repair expenses or related losses. Its significance lies in how class actions can aggregate many similar complaints into one proceeding—pressuring automakers to address alleged widespread problems and giving individual owners a practical path to recover money without filing separate cases. Similar automotive class actions often center on safety-critical components (brakes, airbags, steering, engine controls) and are shaped by the broader regulatory environment: automakers operate under federal motor vehicle safety oversight, including standards and defect-reporting obligations administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and settlements like this one sit alongside (and sometimes parallel) recalls, technical service bulletins, and warranty policies that define what repairs are offered and who pays for them.

Entities Involved

Ram Trucks
Ram 2500
Ram 3500
Ram 4500
Ram 5500
Anti-lock Braking System (ABS)
fcarambrakesettlement.com

Related Topics

Ram ABS settlement
Ram anti-lock braking system class action
2017 Ram 2500 ABS claim
2018 Ram 3500 brake settlement
Ram 4500 5500 ABS lawsuit
Ram truck braking system settlement website
FCA Ram brakes settlement
Ram heavy duty ABS defect
how to file Ram ABS settlement claim
Ram 2500 3500 ABS reimbursement
anti-lock brake system recall class action
Ram truck owners settlement eligibility

Eligibility Requirements

  • Be a current owner or current lessee of an eligible Ram truck
  • Vehicle must be a Ram 2500, 3500, 4500, or 5500 model year 2017 or 2018
  • Vehicle must have been built/manufactured between April 1, 2017 and December 29, 2018
  • Submit a claim (if required for the benefit sought) by the applicable deadline, which varies

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.