GSX Techedu 9.5M Settlement Over Alleged Enrollment and Revenue Misstatements

The GSX Techedu 9.5M Settlement Over Alleged Enrollment and Revenue Misstatements settlement offers $9.50M in total to eligible claimants who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded american depositary shares (ads) of gsx techedu inc. (now gaotu techedu inc.) between june 6, 2019, and oct. 20, 2020 (inclusive). The deadline to file is May 30, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.
Deadline: May 30, 2026
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
Provide the last four digits of the claimant’s Social Security number or taxpayer identification number, plus detailed transaction data for GSX ADS (purchases/acquisitions and sales from June 6, 2019 through Jan. 15, 2021, and the share balance held as of the close of trading on Jan. 15, 2021). Supporting documentation is required, such as brokerage account statements, trade confirmations, transaction reports, or a signed/authorized statement from a broker, financial advisor, trading platform, or other financial institution.
Settlement Summary
GSX Techedu (now Gaotu Techedu) is a China-based online education company whose shares traded in the U.S. as American depositary shares (ADSs), a structure that lets U.S. investors buy an interest in a foreign company on American exchanges. The case centers on a period after GSX’s June 2019 IPO, when the market was rewarding fast-growing edtech firms and closely watching headline metrics like student enrollments and revenue growth—figures that can be hard for outsiders to verify, especially for companies operating primarily overseas. Investors filed a federal securities class action alleging GSX and certain executives misrepresented or omitted key facts about enrollments and revenues, which allegedly inflated the ADS price and led to losses when the truth emerged through “corrective disclosures.” The $9.5 million settlement does not require the defendants to admit wrongdoing, but it matters because it provides a recovery mechanism for investors who bought during the class period (June 6, 2019 to Oct. 20, 2020) and reflects how U.S. securities law polices disclosure even for foreign issuers trading here—primarily under the Securities Act of 1933 (for offering-related claims tied to IPOs/secondary offerings) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (for alleged misleading statements to the market). The payout formula’s use of event dates, “artificial inflation,” and a 90‑day lookback period mirrors common securities-settlement practices designed to approximate losses attributable to alleged misstatements rather than general market swings. More broadly, the dispute fits a familiar pattern in U.S.-listed China ADR/ADS litigation: allegations of misstated operational metrics, heavy reliance on public disclosures, and sharp price reactions to negative revelations—often amplified by short-seller reports and heightened scrutiny of cross-border auditing and transparency. Similar investor suits have targeted other China-based issuers and high-growth sectors where key performance indicators can be especially susceptible to aggressive reporting, underscoring the ongoing tension between investor appetite for rapid growth and the disclosure, accounting, and enforcement challenges regulators face when the underlying business and records sit largely outside the United States.
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded American depositary shares (ADS) of GSX Techedu Inc. (now Gaotu Techedu Inc.) between June 6, 2019, and Oct. 20, 2020 (inclusive)
- Suffered damages/losses allegedly tied to the ADS purchases/acquisitions during the class period
- Includes ADS purchased in or traceable to the initial public offering around June 6, 2019
- Includes ADS purchased in or traceable to the secondary public offering around Nov. 20, 2019
- Claim must be submitted by the beneficial owner (not merely a third party holding for them)
- If securities were jointly owned, each joint owner must sign the claim form
- If filing on behalf of someone else (e.g., executor/trustee/guardian/agent), claimant must provide documentation showing authority to act
- Holding exposure only through a mutual fund does not, by itself, qualify someone as a class member
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
