Skip to main content
Back
Aug 15, 2026
124

City of San Diego $40 Million Settlement for Unlawful Single-Family Water Rates

Settlement Image

The City of San Diego $40 Million Settlement for Unlawful Single-Family Water Rates settlement offers $40M in total to eligible claimants who must be a single-family residential water customer of the city of san diego. The deadline to file is September 28, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
38 days remaining

Deadline: September 28, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$40M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No claim form is required for eligible class members. The settlement administrator will use City records to identify eligible customers and calculate refunds based on the difference between amounts paid and amounts that would have been paid under a lawful rate structure. To confirm payment details, recipients may need the ID and passcode included in the settlement notice; those who do not have them should contact the administrator. Claims are not described as requiring additional documents or receipts.

Settlement Summary

Between Aug. 14, 2014, and Dec. 1, 2023, many single-family residential customers of the City of San Diego paid water rates set by the city’s pricing structure. A class action lawsuit—now resolved through a $40 million settlement—claimed those rates were unlawful because they were not proportional to what it actually cost the city to provide water service to single-family homes. In plain terms, the case focused on fairness in how utility costs are allocated, arguing that customers were charged in a way that allegedly didn’t match the constitutional limits on rate setting. The lawsuit was filed to force the city to answer whether its billing practices violated legal standards, and it became significant because it created a path for eligible customers to receive refunds without each person having to prove their own claim. The settlement includes roughly 436,069 class members, including both property owners and tenants who paid water bills, and payments are calculated based on the difference between what customers paid and what they would have paid under a lawful rate structure as modeled by the city’s expert. The case also sits within the broader industry context of U.S. constitutional limits and regulatory principles governing municipal utilities—where rate-setting must generally be defensible and tied to service-related costs—echoing similar disputes nationwide in which consumers challenge whether water, electric, or other utility charges were properly justified, and here the agreement channels any remaining unclaimed funds to environmental oversight through the Sierra Club California Water Committee, culminating in the distribution process once the court finalizes the settlement after appeals and approval.

Entities Involved

City of San Diego
CPT Group Inc.
Sierra Club California Water Committee
Sierra Club San Diego chapter
Patz v. City of San Diego
SDWaterSettlement@cptgroup.com
sdwatersettlement.com

Related Topics

City of San Diego water rate refund
San Diego water class action settlement
single-family residential water customers
unconstitutional water rates settlement
water bill refund
CPT Group settlement administrator
SDWaterSettlement claim information
Patz v. City of San Diego settlement
water rate proportionality lawsuit
utility rate refund class action
property owners tenants water bill settlement
San Diego water settlement payout
online payment election settlement
no claim required water refund
Sierra Club California Water Committee residual funds

Eligibility Requirements

  • Must be a single-family residential water customer of the City of San Diego
  • Must have received City water service at any time from Aug. 14, 2014 through Dec. 1, 2023
  • Must have been responsible for paying the water bill (includes both property owners and tenants)

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.