CertainTeed is a major North American roofing manufacturer, and for years it sold “organic” asphalt shingles—shingles made with a paper/felt base saturated with asphalt, a product type that was widely used before fiberglass-mat shingles became dominant. Owners later reported that some organic shingles could deteriorate prematurely, leading to cracking, curling, granule loss, and ultimately leaks and roof damage that can be costly to diagnose and replace. The class action settlement described here covers owners of buildings with CertainTeed Organic Shingles manufactured after July 1, 1987, and offers payments that vary based on the extent of damage and the specific product/claim circumstances, with documentation required to substantiate eligibility and losses. The lawsuit was filed because plaintiffs alleged the shingles did not perform as expected over a normal service life, leaving homeowners and building owners facing early replacement costs and potential interior damage. Its significance is that it converts what might otherwise be handled through individual warranty disputes into a standardized, court-supervised claims process that can reimburse part of the replacement cost and set clearer rules for proof (such as product identification, installation details, and evidence of damage). More broadly, the case fits a long-running pattern of roofing and building-products litigation where consumers challenge alleged defects or durability issues—similar disputes have arisen across the industry involving shingles, siding, and other exterior materials—against a backdrop of building-code requirements for weather resistance, manufacturer limited-warranty terms that often prorate coverage over time, and consumer-protection standards that scrutinize whether product performance and marketing claims align with real-world longevity expectations.