Back
Feb 26, 2026
275

Arrival SA 11.28M Settlement Over Alleged Misstatements Tied to CIIG Merger

Settlement Image

Deadline

0 days remaining

Deadline: February 24, 2026

Total Settlement Amount

$11.28M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range

TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase

Required

Provide records showing each transaction involving Arrival or CIIG securities (purchases, acquisitions, sales, and any redemptions), such as broker trade confirmations, brokerage account statements, clearinghouse records, bank records with transaction details, or other comparable documentation accepted by the settlement administrator. Representatives filing for others must also include proof of authority (e.g., executor/trustee/guardian documentation) as applicable.

Settlement Summary

Arrival SA, an electric-vehicle company, went public in March 2021 through a “de‑SPAC” merger with CIIG Merger Corp., a process that lets a private company list by combining with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC). The settlement covers investors who bought Arrival or CIIG securities from Nov. 18, 2020, to Nov. 19, 2021, as well as CIIG shareholders who could vote on or redeem shares before the deal closed—two groups often affected when SPAC marketing, projections, and merger disclosures later come under scrutiny. The lawsuit was filed because investors alleged Arrival and other defendants made false or misleading statements about the company’s business and financial prospects in connection with the merger, inflating prices and harming shareholders when the truth emerged. Without admitting wrongdoing, Arrival agreed to pay $11.275 million (plus any leftover amount from a $2 million defense-cost reserve) to resolve claims brought under key U.S. securities laws, including anti-fraud provisions (Section 10(b)), proxy-solicitation rules (Section 14(a)), and disclosure requirements tied to offering documents (Section 11). The case matters because it illustrates how investors can seek recovery when merger-related communications are alleged to paint an overly optimistic picture, and it highlights the real financial exposure companies face even when they choose to settle to avoid prolonged litigation risk. More broadly, this fits a wave of SPAC- and de‑SPAC-related securities suits that surged as many post-merger companies missed projections or revised expectations, prompting allegations that pre-merger statements weren’t adequately grounded. Regulators, including the SEC, have also tightened the compliance environment around SPAC disclosures and projections, emphasizing accountability for statements made in investor presentations, registration materials, and proxy filings—areas central to many similar cases across the market as courts and companies adapt to increased scrutiny of how high-growth stories are sold to public investors.

Entities Involved

Arrival SA
CIIG Merger Corp.
Strategic Claims Services
Arrival SA Securities Litigation
U.S. federal court (fairness hearing referenced)
Plan of Allocation
Defense cost reserve ($2,000,000)

Eligibility Requirements

  • Purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded securities of Arrival SA or CIIG Merger Corp. between Nov. 18, 2020 and Nov. 19, 2021 and allegedly suffered damages
  • OR beneficially owned and held CIIG common stock that was eligible to vote at CIIG’s special meeting and/or eligible for redemption before the March 24, 2021 business combination
  • May be an individual or an entity (institutional investors may qualify)
  • If filing through an authorized representative, submission must meet the claim form’s representative/beneficial owner requirements
  • If filing on behalf of another person/entity as an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee, or other legal representative, must provide documentation showing authority

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.